In the world of professional football, players are often celebrated for their talent, resilience, and dedication. But behind the scenes, many face silent battlesāesp. those playing in their home countries across Africa. A recent case highlights a troubling gap in global football governance.
A professional footballer in Ethiopia found himself in a contractual dispute with his club over unpaid wages amounting to approximately USD 25,000. Naturally, he sought recourse. But hereās the problem: FIFA, the global governing body, only intervenes in employment disputes that have an international dimensionātypically when the player and club are from different member associations. For domestic disputes, FIFA expects the matter to be resolved by a National Dispute Resolution Chamber (NDRC) within the country.
But what happens when that NDRC doesnāt existāor isnāt recognised by FIFA āļø
Thatās exactly the dilemma this player faced. Despite efforts to resolve the issue through the Ethiopian Football Federation, and the Playerās Union, he was ultimately referred back to FIFA. Yet FIFA declined jurisdiction, citing its policy of non-intervention in domestic matters. The result? The player was left in limbo, with no recognised forum to hear his case or enforce his rights š¢.
This isnāt just an isolated incident. Itās a systemic issue affecting many players, clubs and coaches across Africa and other regions where national dispute resolution mechanisms are either absent or fail to meet FIFAās procedural standards.
According to FIFAās own NDRC Recognition Principles (2024) and Explanatory Notes, FIFA may step in when:
No recognised NDRC exists;
The existing NDRC does not meet FIFAās standards;
The parties are denied access to a fair and impartial forum.
Yet, in practice, players are often left without clarity or support šš¢.
Why This Matters āļø
Football is more than a gameāitās a livelihood. When players are denied access to justice, it undermines the integrity of the sport and leaves them vulnerable to exploitation. The absence of a recognised NDRC in some countries creates a legal vacuum, where clubs can breach contracts with little accountability, and players have no meaningful recourse.
What Needs to Change āļø
ā Transparency: FIFA should publish and regularly update a list of recognised NDRCs so players and stakeholders know where they stand. If there is one, someone please point me in the right direction šš½
ā Accountability: MAs must be held to account for establishing and maintaining fair, independent dispute resolution systems.
ā Access to Justice: In the absence of a functioning NDRC, FIFA should be willing to exercise its fallback jurisdiction to protect playersā rights.
Until these gaps are addressed, too many players will continue to fall through the cracksāunseen, unheard, and unprotected.
To enjoy the full benefit of this post and some interesting comments, you can also view it on LinkedIn: